Monday, March 04, 2013
The History Channel's The Bible: My Thoughts, Part 1
I was a speech communications major in college. That meant
30 plus hours of speech, theater and classes in that vein. I was involved in
several productions and enjoyed the time spent acting immensely. After college
I remained in the speech realm in preaching and teaching. Later I was in a
drama group where we performed all manner of productions. In addition to
acting, I was able to be involved in directing and writing a lot of drama,
including a full three act play.
While I was in that group, we led our church of 3,000 in an
annual production called a “Praise Pageant,” which was a combination of music
and theater done with the highest quality by trained individuals. It was attended
by 10,000 folks a year. I was privileged for four years to play Jesus in that
production. It was, and is, the highlight of my dramatic involvement. I have
some of my fondest memories from those events.
In addition to other outcomes, it also led me to a great
love of what I like to affectionately call, “Bathrobe Dramas.” Some are quite
well done and very accurate Biblically. Others are less well done, and less
accurate. I simply take them as they are intended and enjoy them. At times they
have given me a new perspective on a passage that I had not thought of before.
In my collection I have numerous DVDs of Biblical
productions. Many have some of the biggest names in the entertainment industry
playing key roles. For example, I have one on the life of David where Leonard
Nimoy (Spock from the Star Trek series)
plays the role of the prophet Samuel. These DVDs are a great source of Biblical
discussion between Gavin and me. He and I will play a portion of one and then
talk about what we have just seen. At a later night we pick up where we left
of. It is a great way to open up discussion with children regarding the
Scriptures.
For those reasons and many others, I was very excited to
learn that the mini-series The Bible
was in production and sought to be Biblically accurate and cinematographically
done of the highest quality. You will notice some “artistic license” in this
series as with all of its predecessors. After all, they only have so much time
and so much material.
I was a bit dismayed reading online this evening some of the
numerous criticisms on the production after only one installment. Can we not
forget our interpretive differences? I know some things shown do not line up
exactly, but come on people, if you get lost in those all I can say is you have
simply lost the plot!
While we are at it, let’s be honest here, some of the things
folks are complaining about are not as clear in the Biblical text as we want to
believe they are. In many of the Biblical narratives, there are details that
quite honestly are not given at all! What do we do? We fill in the details as
WE think they were or as we want them to be. Some of our blank filling comes
from ideas, thoughts, past sermons, or whatever, that we bring to the actual
text. Then when it is not portrayed on the screen as we think it should be, we
get all over it. In truth if we go back read the text slowly and thoughtfully, we
find it is not as cut and dried in some of the narratives as we may have
thought.
Can we not simply be glad that people are actually talking
about our Bible in a positive light on two major cable TV channels? Do we need
to pick apart items that are moved around for the sake of artistic license or
to make a story flow on the screen? Do we have to get on them because of the
English or American flavor in places? Can we not give credit where credit is
due? This was a monumental task they have undertaken and I for one cannot
applaud their efforts enough. Would we really rather folks were watching Honey
Boo Boo or Teen Mom? Have WE lost the plot of why God has us here in the first
place?
I have read so many criticizing the accents, or the
portrayals that I wonder if they noticed some key items. Did you not notice that there were more people
of color in this version than in any of these films I recall ever seeing? There were two angels with Abraham and Lot. That
should be accurate enough for the most cynical. But did you notice that one was
portrayed as a Black man the other as an Asian? Did you see that throughout each scene, God was
portrayed as ultimately FOR us not against us?
In my weekly emails to each congregation I have served as
pastor in recent years I close them with the phrase “Come expectantly,” in
regard to Sunday worship. For this television mini-series my phrase is “Watch
expectantly.” See what God may have for you. Why is that so hard? Could it be that
somewhere deep down we are afraid of what God may actually say to us?
at 1:13 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment